Helburua na cooperativa paradigmaticoak
Dio Vanek an "The participatory economy" (publicatua an "Comparative economic systems: models and cases" editatua ka Bornstein an 1979):
1.: Cooperativa guztiak ez dira zertan berdinak izan behar respectu euren helburu nagusia. Egon daitezke cooperativak zeinen helburu exclusivoa izan daiteke autointeres economico hutsa; eta egon daitezke bestelako cooperativak non oso importanteak izan daitezke interes altruistagoak. Azken horiek dira cooperativa paradigmanticoak, baina akaso ez ohikoenak.
2.: Analisi economico formalean oso urria da literatura non consideratzen dira (formalki) motivazio ez pecuniarioak, eta akaso bide horretatik joan beharko lirake ahalegin teorico berriak.
3.: Ikuspuntu empiricotik, ondo legoke ailegatzea a cuantificatzea zenbat eta nolako enpresa cooperativo berri jaiotzen dira modu batekoak eta bestekoak. Bai-eta zein testuinguru enpresarialean jaiotzen dira ere.
In classical capitalism the moving force was the maximization of profit. In the Galbraithian new industrial state it is the self-interest of the upper managament stratum of the large corporation, and in Soviet-type systems it is a combination of the fear of penalties attached to plan nonfulfillment and various types of bonuses extended to the plant manager.Honi buruz hiru komentario:
In the participatory economy it is a combination of the interests of the members of the labor-managed firm as individuals on the one hand, and as a collective on the other. More specifically, and thinking first of the problem in pecuniary terms, the labor-managed firm's aim is the maximization of income for each of its members. ...
This pecuniary objective of income maximization can be thought of as the crude form of the movinf force of the labor-managed systems. ... it lends to a simple formal analysis ...
The true objective of the participatory firm is complex and multidimensional. If we insisted on reducing it to a single variable, we could do not otherwise than to say that the single variable is the degree of satisfaction of the individuals within the collective. Of course, monetary income may be an important ingredient of the satisfaction, especially in very poor environments, but it is definitely not the only one. The working collective can, for example, sacrifice some money income in exchange for additional leisure time, lesser intensity of work, better human relations - or ever a kinder managing director. ... In fact, the broader interpreatation of the motivation base can include even objectives which normally would not be included under the heading of "self-interest," such as giving employment to others in the community, preventing unfavorable external effects of production such as air or water pollution, and many others.
... We may refer to the crudely functioning income-maximizing objective as the narrow motivation principle and to the other, truer objective -which embraces a multiplicity of particular objectives- as the broad motivation principle. [133-134 or.]
1.: Cooperativa guztiak ez dira zertan berdinak izan behar respectu euren helburu nagusia. Egon daitezke cooperativak zeinen helburu exclusivoa izan daiteke autointeres economico hutsa; eta egon daitezke bestelako cooperativak non oso importanteak izan daitezke interes altruistagoak. Azken horiek dira cooperativa paradigmanticoak, baina akaso ez ohikoenak.
2.: Analisi economico formalean oso urria da literatura non consideratzen dira (formalki) motivazio ez pecuniarioak, eta akaso bide horretatik joan beharko lirake ahalegin teorico berriak.
3.: Ikuspuntu empiricotik, ondo legoke ailegatzea a cuantificatzea zenbat eta nolako enpresa cooperativo berri jaiotzen dira modu batekoak eta bestekoak. Bai-eta zein testuinguru enpresarialean jaiotzen dira ere.